PenMuse-52

Prompt:

Created by Laura Lamarca, and named after her daugher Remy Lawren, RemyLa Rhyme is a four-stanza poem. Its features include:

Each stanza has four lines.
The syllable count per stanza is 8/10/12/8,
The rhyme scheme is abca defd ghig jklj.
The first word of stanza 1 must also be the last word of stanza 4.
The last word of stanza 1 must also be the first word of stanza 2 and the last word of stanza 2 must be the first word of stanza 3. Finally, the last word of stanza 3 must also be the first word of stanza 4.

Note: Kindly highlight all first and last words used.

Following the form’s features, pen a RemyLa Rhyme on any topic.
Send in your entries, as an attachment in a word document (.doc/.docx, any other file will not be published), to penmagica@gmail.com along with a 2-3 line bio (not required if previously sent).
The subject of your mail should be Entry for #PenMuse-52 (compulsory).
Along with your entry please send a suggested cover for your poem. (please send it as a separate attachment. Make sure it is a stock photo, no watermarks, and of high resolution –800 pixels and above). The elves at Penmancy are mighty pleased if a poem is accompanied by a cover.
Rules:

Winning criteria:

The winner will be chosen on the basis of the judges’ scores (out of 10)
- creativity/content and originality, [12 points]
- coherence of form and structure (harmony of words, presentation), [12 points]
- clarity of imagery and language/grammar, [10 points]
- emotional impact, [10 points]
- topic/relevance to the theme, [6 points]
The entries adjudged by a panel of judges and event organisers shall be binding. Judges’ scores to be deemed final and may not be contested. Final scores are not disclosed to the participants.
The entries adjudged through this process shall be binding. No scores will be shared with the participants.
All writers are required to read and comment on 5 stories other than their own and encourage their fellow writers with valuable and constructive inputs. Comments like “nice”, “good work”, “brilliant piece”, etc. do not provide the necessary critique and are not helpful for anyone.